Disclaimer

All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. atom42 makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.

Do we need the Apple iPad?

by Jon 28. January 2010 15:37

All across Silicon Valley and in labs and R&D centres in the UK there are storerooms and hard drives full of brilliant technology. Yet most of it will never see the light of day. You’ll find the inventors of this wunderkind tech walking around the offices of venture capital companies and investment firms steadily being rejected time and time again. These brilliant, yet hapless, souls are all perplexed by one question:

'who’s going to buy it and why?'

It is a galling prospect for a scientist to entertain - they have created a beautiful piece of engineering but they can’t find an ugly problem to solve with it. Today, with the launch of the Apple iPad, I find myself looking at something very beautiful and clever, but which seems unlikely to make any difference to my life.

Is there really a need for the iPad?

Don’t get me wrong - I like Apple a lot, it is a great company with some fantastically-designed products. I am a proud owner of an iPod and the next time I buy a new mobile, the iPhone will be a tempting prospect. However, all of the world’s best products, of whatever category, must address a real need, and Apple’s best offerings are no different.

The Sony Walkman made music portable and the iPod finished the job by boosting storage space so much that we could choose from our entire music collection. The Apple Mac offered a real alternative to Windows-based PCs and the aforementioned iPhone provided all the benefits of a PDA and an iPod in one device. But the question for the iPad is: what does it really give us that we don’t already have or need?

The ‘third category’

Apple head honcho Steve Jobs is talking about a ‘third category’ into which the iPad fits, between the laptop and mobile phone. The problem here is that at the moment the ‘third category’ doesn’t really exist and there’s no clear evidence that should or ever will. Possibly this is why Apple has decided on such a low price point for the iPad. It needs to shift some units fast and then hopefully the public will decide what it is really for.

To be fair, the iPad has some scope. It comes with 12 pre-loaded applications and Jobs hopes that it will spawn a whole new generation of online invention. This is entirely possible but remains to be seen. Until then the iPad might just fall between two stools, too big to be a phone without really making it to computer level, either. 

Tags:

Comments

28/01/2010 17:12:34 #

It's a bit like the MiniDisc though really, isn't it (Andy will know this arguement well)?

You can see why it's great.

More importantly, you can see what's wrong with it. You can understand the the way in which it could be improved (camera, USB, apps, flash, open platform, usb ports, sensible sized sim cards, SD port, etc etc) but until the thing that will eventually replace it (iPad 3.0?) comes along it will sit there being the thing that you "kind of want" but don't really know why you want it when you know it's not going to be useful to you.

Most of us will get one before the real end-game is reached.

If Stephen Fry's to be believed (http://www.stephenfry.com/2010/01/28/ipad-about/), it's only going to take 5 minutes playing with a mate's "real life" iPad before you want seven of them (one for every room in the house, obvs). It gauls me that he's right, but he is.

So, basically, who's going first and does anyone want a shoebox full of MDs?

Sent from my iPhone, obvs.

Toby Cummins

28/01/2010 18:13:43 #

Hmmm, I am torn. As a lover of all things beautiful my immediate reaction is 'wow, I want one' - but then my brain kicks in and I can't really figure out why (apart from the fact that it's thin and shiny and has the apple logo on the back).

Firstly, it just does everything the iPhone does, but is bigger - not a plus point IMHO. Then I think about watching movies on the thing and, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the fact that it can't stand up by itself a little limiting here? On a train you would either have to lie it flat or try and stand it up somehow. I personally would rather watch a movie on, yep you guessed it, a laptop. I then watch the demo video and see some guy playing a game on it, realistically leaning from side to side in a driving simulation - imagining grown men playing this on the tube just makes me giggle. Finally, as Toby mentioned, you have the obvious downsides; no usb drive and no camera (for a webcam, not for snapping holiday shots Paul Smile )

So, my final decision - I won't be getting one (for now at least...)

Stacy Oakley

28/01/2010 18:15:18 #

I have to agree with what everyone else has said. I won't be getting one, as I don't see the problem it's solving? However at £350 ish, I can see a lot of people jumping on the 'I want one because I think everyone else will want one' bandwagon...

Apple are sooooo cool.

Jamin

29/01/2010 09:09:54 #

One thing on Stacy's comment - I wouldn't let the no stand thing colour you judgement, given that when you search iPod on Amazon you get over 32,000 results and there are only 6 iPod's you can buy...

Apple already released this at launch:
www.ilounge.com/.../

Still ooking for a taker on that box of minidiscs though...

Toby Cummins

29/01/2010 13:47:59 #

Ok, so maybe I would watch a movie on it... Damn apples thinking of everything!!!

Stacy Oakley

01/02/2010 09:13:21 #

This is pretty good too, if you've not seen it:
www.guardian.co.uk/.../ipad-therefore-iwant-why-idunno

Toby Cummins

Comments are closed